AMKent books

a Higher-Dimensional Paradigm by A.M. Kent

In the scientific reports published in June 2023, researchers conducting an experiment using a continuous-wave laser in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer found that despite initial predilection that it would favour particle-like behaviour, it favoured wave-like behaviour instead. This essentially posits that certain devices and their observation are favoured over a predetermined causality. This potentially provides insight into the Souls observer effect, as collapsed quantum states’ behavioural changes apply under certain conditions. The experiment revealed that using coherent photons instead of entangled ones could still provide a measured effect of quantum erasure.

The experimental findings of coherent photons being able to create quantum erase effects suggest that locality may not be the only player in this game, as something that exists outside of the universe’s locality may influence collapse states. This measurement of the changing within retrocausality and entropy can be used as evidence for the 6th-dimensional state of the soul as an ultimate top-down observer, changing and compelling states in the past and present to adhere to the soul’s future effect. The soul, which is a name placeholder for an ethereal antagonist that’s observation causes an infinite universal recursion where the observed consequently observes back, martyring its creator. The Soul funnel’s observation down through dimensionalities, and whilst it does not adhere to our third-dimensional time, it exists in a state of paradox akin to an ouroboros. This could be used to explain quantum erasure and the constraint of particles’ behavioural patterns.

Additionally, in an MKID study published in the Journal of Low Temperature Physics that was investigating pulse-triggered feedback loops, with the intention of exploring the information paradox. The information paradox is the polarising nature of general relativity and quantum mechanics. Found that due to the high sensitivity, the experiment enabled a pulse-triggered feedback loop, allowing real-time control of the optical path length. In my paradigm, observation that occurs in a higher state of dimensionality changes the behaviour of lower state quantum functions.

A variable-driven effect that influences the path of quantum erasure, higher states of the quantum are collapsed and funnelled into deforming echoes, each dimensional drop a metamorphosis to its outcome. The Soul exists outside causality; its top-down observation is the reason for it, whilst it does not operate with agency, it does inadvertently manipulate the reaction of matter through all forms of reality. Live and real-time feedback could explain the assembling of matter that influences emergent phenomena, such as the collapsed state of matter that becomes palatable for consciousness to arise. The experiments display potentially retrocausality and feedback loops, aligning with the idea of a self-looping antagonist that exists non-locally.

The issue here is that quantum erasure itself is not directly linked to consciousness, and theories like Orch-OR that propose quantum effects are the culprit for the arising consciousness are still speculative and controversial. So, this is a speculative leap that hopefully becomes less speculative as time goes on and more evidence about the nature of our reality is revealed. However, the looping effect displayed within these experiments does show a nature that could potentially be akin to an absolute that behaves as an ouroboros. There would need to be more experiments on entropy changes when quantum erasure and delayed-choice influence over the behaviour of future states.

Moreover, time-symmetric quantum mechanics (Aharonov’s Two-State Vector Formalism) could help explain the bidirectionality of the soul as an ultimate observer, focusing on the symmetrical processes of time evolution as a bidirectional state. This idea ties in nicely with delayed-choice and quantum erasure as support for the nature of an absolute observer that exists outside of the universe, and the tax that it pays in the form of entropy spikes for sustaining reality’s cosmic metamorphosis. It also provides a mathematically strong backbone to the idea of bidirectionality in time and its evolution, something that mirrors my paradigm’s function.

A recent study by researchers Cofre and Destexhe investigated entropic spikes within Neuroscience. Entropy and complexity play roles in brain signalling, which is akin to the ever-changing entropic collapsing of funnelled observation. Intracellular recordings track patterns of the brain’s function, and when applying entropy and complexity, these recordings show effects on sensory processing, which could provide an insight into the hard problem of qualia. Thus, their research further shows that when tracking the brain’s dynamic patterns of behavioural function using entropy and complexity, there is a kind of micro-collapsing that links to observation above its dimensional parameters.

Finally, I will discuss a recent revelation I had on the nature of dark matter within my paradigm. Dark matter seems to only present its effects when gravity is applied to the equation. Galactic rotation curves are an example of this. Dark matter also does not radiate, as it does not seem to interact with electromagnetic radiation, hence the name ‘Dark Matter’. I will now propose something highly speculative. To put it simply at first, dark matter effects are too watered-down by the funnelling effect of the top-down observer that they are a weak interaction in our dimensionality. I am positing that once dark matter reaches our third dimension, it is barely an echo of its former glory; its full state is vastly more presentable closer to the absolute observer. It has no radiative capacity because it has been suppressed heavily by the filtering effect of dimensional observation collapse; it is essentially only able to be a mass that interacts with gravity despite its importance within existence. To use a metaphor, we see its shadow, akin to Plato’s allegory of the cave, but we do not see the dimensional object that has cast this shadow, only its lesser complex form.

Limitations

This paradigm is highly speculative, and whilst it tries to bridge a gap between metaphysics and quantum physics, there are many leaps without solid empirical evidence being made. As new evidence and experimentation arise in neuroscience and physics, hopefully, it will further support this paradigm and its implications on reality. Until then, this remains a limited but ambitious and continuously evolving in its assertions on the nature of reality.

References

Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., & Lebowitz, J. L. (1964). Time symmetry in the quantum process of measurement. Physical Review, 134(6B), B1410–B1416. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.134.B1410

Cofré, R., & Destexhe, A. (2025). Entropy and complexity tools across scales in neuroscience: A review. Entropy, 27(2), Article 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27020115

Hameroff, S. R., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch‑OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002

Jacques, V., Wu, E., Grosshans, F., Treussart, F., Grangier, P., Aspect, A., & Roch, J. F. (2007). Experimental realization of Wheeler’s delayed‑choice GedankenExperiment. Science, 315(5814), 966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136303

Kim, S., & Ham, B. S. (2023). Observations of the delayed‑choice quantum eraser using coherent photons. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 9758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36590-7

Maldacena, J. (1998). The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 2(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1

Misra, B., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1977). The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18(4), 756–763. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523304

Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch‑OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002

Scully, M. O., & Drühl, K. (1982). Quantum eraser: A proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and “delayed choice” in quantum mechanics. Physical Review A, 25(4), 2208–2213. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.2208

Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: A provisional manifesto. The Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.2307/25470707

Vitiello, G. (2001). Dissipation and memory capacity in the quantum brain model. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 15(10), 1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979201005684

Wheeler, J. A. (1983). Law without law. In J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement (pp. 182–213). Princeton University Press.

Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715–775. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715

Zurek, W. H. (2009). Quantum Darwinism. Nature Physics, 5(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1202