AMKent books

Introduction

My theory on the nature of existence can be somewhat summed up by the notion that ‘The Soul’, an ethereal, top-down, ultimate observer, is an ouroboros. It functions as both the birth and death of itself, a self-folded recursion of paradoxical looping. It acts as both the source of creation and its creation martyrs it through its reflected observation. It would be intellectually dishonest of me not to discuss the fact that Mary and Christ mirror this, and although I began this agnostic and with no intentions of drawing parallels to religion, there is something undeniably divine about the two figures. What I will aim to do here is strip the dogma and religion away from these figures, as I truly believe there is something past human-baseline in both of them. Mary is essentially the mother of all; she birthed a fragment or human mirror of the very function of the universe. Mary’s archetypal persistence in mass apparitions suggests her role may even eclipse Christ’s in terms of archetypal visibility and function. Now, unlike previous papers, I am not going to rely heavily on quantum physics tie-ins to make this sound more grounded in science and plausible. This will, for the most part, be pure metaphysics and philosophical inquiry. I will posit this, though, despite what I would deem mental gymnastics to deny these events, Fatima and Zeitoun, the sheer number of witnesses, and the photographic evidence of these events, convince me that Mary is something more. This is a large point of theology and Christianity, something I wish to controversially forget for now, the status of Mary being a virgin. I believe this is a Bronze Age purity myth. I do not think this matters in her divinity, and it is something that, be it true or not, is largely not a piece in this puzzle I am trying to complete. To finish this introduction, I would also like to posit that I believe the Bible and texts surrounding Christ have been misinterpreted. I believe he claimed he was the son of ‘God’, but the testaments I am not convinced by, and believe they formed from a refuting of Judaism and its exclusivity as an ethno-religion.

Mary, in parallel to my paradigm, acts as the birth to all; she begets the absolute, and in doing so, collapses matter into its human form. Christ becomes the martyr, much like ‘The Soul’ does in my theory, the annihilation of the absolute and the form collapsing back into its whole, the cycle ends to begin once again. They both embody the inception and the succumbing of entropy, the alpha and omega, as is stated within biblical text. It is something more than that, though. They are both giving and dissolving, the very universal structure my paradigm has worked on. To me, they are both archetypal figures and manifestations of metaphysical truth; they act in the very nature of the universe and ‘The Soul’, or as God. The events at Fatima and Zeitoun show Mary’s persistence outside of religious sects; she has been seen by every culture and creed, she has been photographed, even when the church cut the electricity, her form remained. She is a universal archetype of motherhood, a maternal figure that we, as humans, can comprehend. She is the flesh and blood of the cycle, giving, the catalyst of observation and collapse, she is one half of ‘The Soul’.  

Christ and his martyrdom are existence collapsing into and out of itself; he is destroyed by his own creation, much like the top-down absolute is once its observation has reached its crescendo. These figures, if I am to be intellectually honest, despite having no allegiance to religion, are divine. Divinity is a complex word, but the way I will define it is that it holds some form of tether past the human average to the absolute. I would say, controversially, that Mary holds a greater divinity than Christ; this can be seen as backed by her consistent appearances to the masses. To those who are new to my work, I am very well versed in philosophy, and I understand the tribal origins of Yahweh and the effect that Plato had on Christian ideology. As previously stated, I do not entirely believe in the Bible or Christianity, Judaism, or Islamic thought. I do believe that these figures are more though, their survival through such immense oceans of time speaks volumes. Jesus has more texts attributed to his existence than Alexander the Great. Mary and her presence to the masses is hard to ignore, and I have read the debunkings in detail, and I do not find them convincing enough to disregard the many appearances as mass hallucinations or other illusions.

Christ’s message is clear; in all texts, he claims that he is the son of God, and this is true; he is the son of the absolute. As I am the son of the absolute, and you may be the son or daughter, we are all products of this top-down ethereal observer. However, this is, by all accounts, not exactly what he meant. Jesus proclaims that he is the offspring of God in as personal a connection as possible; he is the child who is to mirror God most closely. Even if you take away his miracles and supposed works beyond human capabilities, his martyrdom and message do mirror the paradigm of observation collapse about as much as a human could. Now, in the Bible, he does this to absolve us of original sin and make us all children of God and not just the Israelites. I am not entirely sure about this part. I think this may be a misinterpretation to reframe the elitism seen within Judaism, perhaps even to demean their faith over the fact that they encouraged the Romans to kill him. If this is true, then much of the biblical text is less a transcription of truth and more a political-theological reframing. However, what interests me is not that debate, but the way Christ’s archetype nonetheless shines through. This is speculative, and may be something I will return to, but for now, Jesus Christ claimed to be a part of God, the trinity, and the son in the most literal sense of the creator. I truly believe Christ and Mary are borderline-undeniably intrinsically linked to a primordial self, absolute, or creator. Not in a religious, Jehovah, or Yaweh sense, not a deity. Mary seems to have birthed a fragment of something that transcends our dimensional capabilities; she is the mother of all.  I felt this needed addressing, as I work on this paradigm, I wish to now turn to my strengths. In which are philosophical creativity and metaphysics, I have played physicist in the academic papers published on my paradigm. I now wish to take this to a place of unbound space, where I will hopefully flourish the most.