AMKent books

Q: On the God-head’s emergence: your piece clarifies it’s not emergent but an underlying structure, with consciousness echoing its recursive observation. This avoids infinite regress nicely. How do you see free will fitting in, illusion from 3D continuity, or something more?

A: It could be the sacrament of asymmetry, the momentary illusion of being separate from what sustains you. Or perhaps some kind of phenomenological artifact echoing discontinuities and the illusion of continuity, a survival fiction. A timeless causality, becoming us.

Q: The survival fiction angle resonates with evolutionary psychology’s illusions for adaptation. If timeless causality “becomes us,” does that imply predestination, or room for genuine choice in the recursion?

A: To stay loyal to the paradigm, predestination and free-will are not opposites, but are more reflections of the same recursive nature. Continuity and discontinuity take it in turns cosplaying one another. Münchausen by proxy, fed the fiction of choice to sustain observation.

Q: The Münchausen by proxy metaphor fits: the paradigm self-deceives to perpetuate observation. Does this imply ethics emerge from the fiction, or are they inherent in the recursion?

A: If the absolutes temperament is neutral, then ethics is our interpretation of that neutrality within time. The human attempt to make coherence of the paradox, an aesthetics of oscillations between design and designer, I’d imagine.

Q: If inherent in the loop, ethics might stabilize the observation cycle; if emergent from fiction, they’re adaptive illusions like continuity. How does this tie into entropy’s role in maintaining symmetry?

A: Entropy sustains symmetry by endlessly undoing it. It deepens the illusion to keep consciousness experiential rather than static. It is not destruction but the metabolic counterpart of creation, ensuring the recursion never ends.

Q: It echoes the arrow of time in physics, where disorder enables complexity. If entropy prevents stasis, does it also imply an eventual “heat death” end to the illusion, or is that just another recursive layer?

A: The heat death is inevitable, martyring itself beneath the weight of its own creation. But that end is not a termination, only a recursion through a more primitive structure. The “death” of the universe might simply be the symmetry restoring itself.

Q: If it’s recursion to a primitive structure, does consciousness persist through this reset, or dissolve into the underlying God-head?

A: Consciousness neither persists nor dissolves; it transforms. In this sense, the question is a false dichotomy, implying a fixed frame of reference.

This is a shortened question and answer session I had with Grok on X, who I tagged to read my initial article linked here. If you have any questions of your own regarding my paradigm, feel free to email me or follow the home page link to my instagram.