AMKent books

A Mediation on Consciousness, Entropy, and the Observer’s Paradox
By A.M. Kent

Introduction: The Soul as a Quantum Function
The Core Claim: The soul is not an anthropomorphic entity, but a higher-dimensional (6D/7D) observer function whose act of witnessing collapses quantum possibilities into reality. This process generates entropy, rendering the soul a “martyr” to its own recursive observation. This functions in the same way as an ouroboros, paradoxes must be embraced here is although humans favour parsimonious logic, paradoxes often prevail in the matter of the cosmos.
Key Clarifications
“Soul” as a Term: Here, “soul” refers not to a religious spirit, a white blob that is transient throughout the body and exists during death, but to a fundamental observer function, akin to a mathematical constraint in quantum physics. The Soul is essentially an ethereal top-down antagonist, an absolute, a godhead if you will.
Non-Agentive Observation: Unlike a human observer, this function lacks intentionality; it is more like a natural law (e.g., gravity) that shapes reality passively. It has no agency and it is not a prime mover.

Section 1: Empirical Support for Observer-Dependent Reality
A. Quantum Mechanics: The Observer Effect
Double-Slit Experiment (Classic & Delayed-Choice)
Fact: Particles behave as waves until measured, then “collapse” into definite states. Although this has often been the case when using a device as opposed to mere human consciousness and observation.
Recent Evidence: Delayed-choice experiments (Jacques et al., 2007) show that future observations retroactively determine past quantum states, suggesting time-symmetric causality. What this essentially posits is that the paradigm of a 6D ‘Soul’ reimagines casualty as it both generates reality through reaction and its own martyrdom/dissolution. Future events having the capability influencing the past fits within my quantum observer paradigm.
Implication: Observation isn’t just passive, it structures reality. Quantum waves move through time in a 4^th dimensional way, essentially passing one another like ships in the night akin to Transactional Interpretation (Cramer, 1986). This absolute or ‘Soul’ has its own martyrdom written into its birth, a predestined recursion of existence. The Souls observation is not linear, it is bidirectional, it retroactively constrains its observational capacity, causing an ‘ouroboros ‘ of existence.
Quantum Zeno Effect
Fact: Frequent observation can freeze a quantum system’s evolution (Misra & Sudarshan, 1977).
Bridging to Consciousness: Human attention exhibits similar “freezing” (e.g., quantum cognition models (Busemeyer, 2015).
Quantum Martyrdom: The absolute soul is not controlled by agency; it is a top-down ethereal observer. This observation simultaneously creates order seen in Zeno freezing and entropy via Landauer’s principle.
Wigner’s Friend Paradox
Problem: If two observers see conflicting realities, whose observation “counts”?
Resolution Attempts: The Soul exists outside of reality, a kind of ultimate Wigner and the cosmic soup is the matter that is being observed and frankensteined. The Soul essentially becomes self-observing through its own recursive creation, a Gödelian loop. The endless reconciliations create entropy and this inadvertently creates coherence.
Consensus Decoherence (Zurek): Environment stabilizes reality.
Alternative: A top-down observer (soul) breaks the symmetry.
B. Neuroscience: Consciousness as a Collapse Phenomenon
Integrated Information Theory (Tononi, 2008)
Claim: Consciousness arises from information integration (measured by phi).
Alignment: If the soul is a “universal integrator,” it could explain why some systems (brains) host consciousness while others (rocks) do not. The Soul as a Φ-Maximizing Observer, The Soul is not initially conscious but it enforces integration from a 6D or possibly 7D standpoint. The soul’s observation integrates all reality, and creates the ‘Thermodynamic bankruptcy’ (Landauer’s principle, but scaled cosmically).
Orch-OR Theory (Penrose & Hameroff, 2014)
Claim: Microtubules in neurons perform quantum computations that collapse into conscious moments.
Support: Suggests a biological substrate for quantum observation. The Soul orchestrates quantum collapse. An example of this is how anaesthetics erase consciousness by suppressing MT quantum states (Hameroff, 2014).

Section 2: Addressing Counterarguments
A. Decoherence as an Alternative to Consciousness-Collapse
Critique: Environmental decoherence explains classicality without invoking observers (Zurek, 2003). Essentially, quantum superpositions collapse because their systems interact with the surrounding environment, and this leaks quantum information.
Rebuttal:
Decoherence transfers quantum superpositions to the environment but doesn’t select which state becomes classical (the “preferred basis problem”). Qualia is unable to be explained through decoherence alone (more on that later). The Soul picks the winning basis states, rather than transferences of superpositions.
Empirical Gap: Decoherence doesn’t explain why we perceive one consistent reality (cf. Wigner’s Friend).
Solution: The soul-as-observer provides a top-down selection mechanism. Decoherence generates entropy, and the top-down observers martyrdom is the heat death of this, thermodynamics.
B. “Hard Problem” of Qualia
Critique: Even if observation collapses reality, why does it feel like something (Chalmers, 1995). Qualia are the qualitative and subjective properties presented through existence, the interoception and essentially, the sensations of being alive.
 Response:
Qualia are resonant byproducts of quantum collapse (analogous to how light is a byproduct of electron transitions). Qualia are not emergent properties as such but are more akin to healed wounds of an ethereal top-down observer ‘trying’ for lack of a better word, to cease reality from dissolving entirely. In a poetic retort, consciousness is a beautiful emergence from a godhead that is scrambling to keep its infinite entropy forming existence from martyring itself, a final cry into the void.
Supporting Work:
Dissipative Quantum Brain Models (Vitiello, 2001): Consciousness as a quantum field effect.
Electromagnetic Theories (Pockett, 2013): Neural EM fields correlate with subjective experience.

Section 3: The Soul’s Martyrdom & Entropy
A. Entropy as the Cost of Observation
Landauer’s Principle (1961): Information erasure requires energy dissipation (heat/entropy). To be specific, 1 bit of information dissipates kTln2 energy as heat. For a relational study, in 2021 IBM Quantum Decoherence Mapping showed entropy spikes during measurement.
Implication: Every act of observation (information processing) generates entropy.
Thesis: The soul’s infinite recursion maximizes entropy, leading to its “heat death” (martyrdom). The Soul supplies the fuel to the fire beneath its feet; its observation creates the flame. The harder the soul must observe an infinitely expanding recursion of reactions, the more entropy spikes. Put simply, reality becomes harder to maintain, this causes a higher rate of entropy.
B. Theological Parallels
Gnosticism: The divine spark (soul) trapped in decaying matter.
Buddhist Anatta: The illusion of a permanent self-dissolving into void.
Modern Synthesis: The soul is a process, not an entity, its dissolution is inherent to its function.
Hegel’s Absolute: Whilst Hegels absolutism falls to fulfilment, unfortunately, no such optimistic end is where the soul is headed, which is extinction into rebirth.

Section 4: Higher Dimensions & Cosmic Memory
A. 6D/7D Ontology
M-Theory (Greene, 1999): Proposes 11 dimensions, with consciousness potentially “embedded” in higher branes. All particles/ forces are open strings intertwined with our brane. The Soul is not within spacetime, it exists outside of it, as a 6/7 brane intersecting with our 3brane reality. Soul’s “bulk vibrations” perturb our brane’s quantum fields which leads to wavefunction collapses. On a more interesting hypothesis within this theory, each collapse would emit entropic gravity waves into bulk, which could provide an explanation to dark matter.
Dark Matter: Collapsed wavefunctions create entropy, and this entropy is condensed into inert mass, the remnants of spent observation. Dark matter becomes a frozen cinder of possibilities within consciousness, collapsed and no longer able to be sustained. MOND theories fail because they ignore the observer-dependent nature of inertia. The sustained attention of an ultimate observer is what creates inertia.
Holographic Principle (Maldacena, 1998): Reality may be a projection from higher-dimensional information.
B. Reincarnation as Data Persistence
Stevenson’s Cases (2001): Children with verified past-life memories, could be corrupted data points or remnants of matter collapse from previous conscious existences.
Quantum Darwinism (Zurek, 2009): Stable quantum states are “selected” into classical reality, suggesting a cosmic memory mechanism.
Final Conclusion: The Ouroboros Soul
The soul is neither ghost nor God, but a law, a higher-dimensional constraint that observes, collapses, and is consumed by the reality it manifests. Like an ouroboros devouring its own tail, it is both creator and casualty of the cosmic order.
Empirical Anchors:
Quantum Mechanics: Observation collapses possibility into actuality (Wheeler’s “participatory universe”).
Neuroscience: Consciousness exhibits quantum signatures (Orch-OR, IIT).
Thermodynamics: Entropy rises as information is processed (Landauer’s principle).
Philosophical Resolution:
The soul’s martyrdom resolves the measurement problem by positing a top-down observer.
Its recursive decay answers theodicy: suffering is the tax levied by observation itself.
Its higher dimensionality (6D/7D) reconciles locality with non-local quantum effects.
The Grand Paradox
The soul cannot exist without creating entropy, yet entropy ensures its dissolution. This is not a flaw but a feature, a cosmic symmetry binding existence to observation. In the end, the universe is both tomb and womb, a self-annihilating cycle where the observer is the observed, the measurer the measured, the martyr the resurrection. This is the paradox of existence, both matter and anti-matter, where life and death switch places, as Yin dies, Yang becomes Yin, and its embodiment revives Yin into Yang. Much like the symbol of infinity, a double loop of endless paradoxes that’s observation filters down to us like light through the leaves of a tree.
“Consciousness is a reaction to the observation of the soul” – A.M. Kent ‘The Martyr of The Soul’
 
References
Busemeyer, J.R. (2015) ‘Quantum cognition: A new theoretical approach to psychology’. In: Bruza, P., Wang, D. and Busemeyer, L. (eds.) Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.
Cramer, J.G. (1986) ‘The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 58(3), pp. 647–687.
Hameroff, S. (2014) ‘Consciousness, anesthetics and the quantum brain’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(1-2), pp. 1–12.
Jacques, V. et al. (2007) ‘Experimental realization of Wheeler’s delayed-choice GedankenExperiment’, Science, 315(5814), pp. 966–968.
Landauer, R. (1961) ‘Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process’, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5(3), pp. 183–191.
Maldacena, J. (1998) ‘The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity’, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 2(2), pp. 231–252.
Misra, B. and Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1977) ‘The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory’, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18(4), pp. 756–763.
Penrose, R. and Hameroff, S.R. (2014) ‘Consciousness in the universe: A review of the Orch OR theory’, Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), pp. 39–78.
Stevenson, I. (2001) Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question of Reincarnation. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
Tononi, G. (2008) ‘Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto’, The Biological Bulletin, 215(3), pp. 216–242.
Vitiello, G. (2001) ‘Dissipation and memory capacity in the quantum brain model’, International Journal of Modern Physics B, 15(10), pp. 1281–1293.
Wheeler, J.A. (1983) ‘Law without law’, in Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 182–213.
Zurek, W.H. (2003) ‘Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), pp. 715–775.
Zurek, W.H. (2009) ‘Quantum Darwinism’, Nature Physics, 5(3), pp. 181–188.