AMKent books

Dialogues, part 2

This entry will concern itself over the spectrum of sensations, and how such sensations have defined themselves within the experience of the human condition.

A: I find myself wondering how not only these sensations are consistent, yet we define them linguistically, such as love, hate, happiness, and so on.

B: Perhaps there is an underlying answer within the matter of consciousness collapsing and reforming itself through observation?

A: Interesting, such as love acting as a form of cohesion with another’s conscious matter, an alignment, or resonance that connects and creates not only the sensation but the attachment to the consciousness it matched with.

B: Poetic indeed! It fits our paradigm, but then what could hate be?

A: I imagine it would be a disrupter, unmatched, no resonance, a state that is at odds with the constants and variables of its opposed matter. Whatever it is, it would have to be temporary, fleetingly so, but then we find ourselves defining micro causalities of linear time.

B: We as humans have developed and evolved with the ability of pattern recognition, I think there is a pattern to be recognized within this paradigm.

A: Could our pattern be within the internally changing formations of consciousness, it would explain recurring emotions. Unification seems to be sensed in a positive way to our biology, and anti-cohesion negatively. Take for example happiness, perhaps some kind of neutrality that creates a peace within sentience!

B: Then what about nostalgia? It is both a positive and negative, it can be very bittersweet!

A: It can, I think that there could be several answers. Take my first hypothesis, maybe it is the remembrance of a previous formation, a collapsed state that pattern recognition identifies similarities within once again. My second, is that everything within matter is stored, imprinted, and even through these fluctuations under the observation of the soul what truly defines the depth of sentience is our ability to recall.

B: They sound somewhat similar, one relying on pattern recognition on a quantum scale, the other as some kind of internal stored signature. How long would these imprints last?

A: I would say until it leaves the biology of its host, but transmutation of stored information is something I believe in with this paradigm. So, maybe the data is recycled? Perhaps that is why some feel deeper than others, they are working with matter that harbours more contents.

B: It is fundamental to our nature to draw from the recycled impregnations of matter, I suppose its internal mutations are too the product of our ultimate observer.

A: I think that this is the most likely answer, nothing can leave the universe, because the universe is infinite. So, if energy has nowhere to go, it must transmute, reform, expand, but never dissipate.

B: So, our depth and corresponding sensations is a luck of the draw?

A: That I am not entirely sure of, for intention is clear byproducts of our ultimate observer. The question becomes, how organised is the soul, has it merely cast a stone to see the ripples, or are we something meticulously planned out.

B: Nature has a direction, and it is the infinite that reaches endlessly towards the soul, so it seems that no matter what level of detail does what. It is bound by the eternal expression of reaching towards its master, so to speak.

A: An intrinsic momentum, it fits the notion of the observer reflecting its observation back upon itself.